Feedback
Got a suggestion for improvement? Anything goes.
Found a bug? Let us know. For other inquries feel free to contact us about anything at all.
Depvana •
about •
legal •
contact •
contribute •
Depvana is independent. Help keep it that way.
© 2024 Depvana aps.
Login to add a hashtag.
Hashtags
Bookmark
Topic Mathematics
Public room public room
Moderators •   Beyond
Depth •  Academic disciplines > Mathematics
Purpose • 
yey, maths!
No. 202
199
12
2
More
Copy link
Report
Encrypt
Encrypt post text
Encryption Key
Repeat Key
Encrypt
Encrypt post text before posting. Choose an encryption key to encrypt you post with. Be sure to remember this key, as it is the only way to decrypt and view the content again. Only share this key with individuals you want to be able to decrypt your post.
Note that all encryption is performed locally, and no one will be able to recover the content if you lose this key.
Visible to the public Public post
Attachments • images • video webm/mp4 • max size 4096KiB.
Attachments • images • video webm/mp4 • max 4MB.
Filter by  โ€ข  Newest
Newest
Sort posts in decending order by date
Oldest
Sort posts in ascending order by date
anon@277 
More
Copy link
Report
>
Nah complex numbers are fraud!
anon@277 
More
Copy link
Report
Math has a chan @ mathchan.org
anon@277 
More
Copy link
Report
Anybody who can give an example of a real problem where complex numbers are used to derive a real solution?
kuma@345 
More
Copy link
Report
Consider the set of all natural numbers and the set of all primes.
Since the set of all natural numbers less the set of primes is equal to the products or the elements of the subsets in the power set of the primes, then it is clear that mapping is injective, as all combinations are unique. This is by definition, as composite numbers are exactly those numbers that can the product of primes.
The cardinality of the set of natural numbers is infinite, but it is a much smaller infinity that that of real numbers, obviously, as there are an infinity of infinities (an infinite amount of irrational numbers between each rational, which are themselves infinite) in that set, but only a single infinity in that of the natural numbers.

Now consider: as the number progress to infinity, the likelihood of each number to be a product of some combination of each before it decreases to zero faster than the number line progresses. For example:
in {1,2}, there is a 50% chance of each being prime
in {1,2,...,10}, there is a 40% chance of each being prime
in {1,2,...,100}, there is a 25% chance of each being prime
in {1,2,...,1000}, there is a 16.8% chance of each being prime
in {1,2,...,10^10}, there is a 0.04% chance of each being prime
Thus, as infinity is approached, the number of primes approaches a finite number. This leads us to a contradiction, since any finite number of elements arranged in a any number of combinations will still only lead to a finite number of results.

Thus, since there cannot possibly be an infinite number of primes, there cannot be an infinite number of numbers.

The mere existence of infinity disproves infinity.
Spodogo@369 
More
Copy link
Report
>
General Maths, with "Recreational Maths" as a new topic and Discrete
anon@277 
More
Copy link
Report
>
Is it a library for general math or a new math branch? Never heard of it before
Spodogo@369 
More
Copy link
Report
>
I believe so, sangakus' were problems solved in fedual Japan I think althought the site has spanish translation.

https://www.sangakoo.com/en 

Here is the website, it just contains a libary of mathematical theory which I have found personally useful and I hope people here do too
anon@277 
More
Copy link
Report
>
No sounds japanese though
anon@277 
More
Copy link
Report
Sangaku Maths

Anyone heard of it?
anon@277 
More
Copy link
Report
A cool little video about imaginary numbers, see 5:12 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8CXG7dS-D0