Feedback
Got a suggestion for improvement? Anything goes.
Found a bug? Let us know. For other inquries feel free to contact us about anything at all.
Call to action
Depvana's reach is 100% powered by word of mouth. If you want to help: tell a friend! Let your group chats know, let people know of Depvana.
Depvana is independent. Help keep it that way.
© 2024 Depvana aps.

Mathematics

Public room public room
No. 202
13
2
More
Copy link
Report

yey, maths!

Login to add a hashtag.
Rss
Visible to the public Public post
Attachments • images • video webm/mp4 • max size 4096KiB.
Attachments • images • video • max 4MB.
Newest
Newest
Sort posts in decending order by date
Oldest
Sort posts in ascending order by date
Mode
No.4627 • 
professoren@228 
More
Options
Copy link
Report
Consider the integral of e^x cos(x) 

Without using complex numbers you can integrate this by parts. This is very diffucult though. If you use complex numbers, especially Eulers formula
e^(ix) = cos(x) + isin(x)
The problems becomes much simpler to solve and the immaginary parts cancel out to yield a real result to the integral.
No.4003 • 
anon@277 
More
Options
Copy link
Report
Nah complex numbers are fraud!
No.4002 • 
anon@277 
More
Options
Copy link
Report
Math has a chan @ mathchan.org
No.3970 • 
anon@277 
More
Options
Copy link
Report
Anybody who can give an example of a real problem where complex numbers are used to derive a real solution?
No.3534 • 
kuma@345 
More
Options
Copy link
Report
Consider the set of all natural numbers and the set of all primes.
Since the set of all natural numbers less the set of primes is equal to the products or the elements of the subsets in the power set of the primes, then it is clear that mapping is injective, as all combinations are unique. This is by definition, as composite numbers are exactly those numbers that can the product of primes.
The cardinality of the set of natural numbers is infinite, but it is a much smaller infinity that that of real numbers, obviously, as there are an infinity of infinities (an infinite amount of irrational numbers between each rational, which are themselves infinite) in that set, but only a single infinity in that of the natural numbers.

Now consider: as the number progress to infinity, the likelihood of each number to be a product of some combination of each before it decreases to zero faster than the number line progresses. For example:
in {1,2}, there is a 50% chance of each being prime
in {1,2,...,10}, there is a 40% chance of each being prime
in {1,2,...,100}, there is a 25% chance of each being prime
in {1,2,...,1000}, there is a 16.8% chance of each being prime
in {1,2,...,10^10}, there is a 0.04% chance of each being prime
Thus, as infinity is approached, the number of primes approaches a finite number. This leads us to a contradiction, since any finite number of elements arranged in a any number of combinations will still only lead to a finite number of results.

Thus, since there cannot possibly be an infinite number of primes, there cannot be an infinite number of numbers.

The mere existence of infinity disproves infinity.
No.3520 • 
spodogo@369 
More
Options
Copy link
Report
General Maths, with "Recreational Maths" as a new topic and Discrete
No.3517 • 
anon@277 
More
Options
Copy link
Report
Is it a library for general math or a new math branch? Never heard of it before
No.3515 • 
spodogo@369 
More
Options
Copy link
Report
I believe so, sangakus' were problems solved in fedual Japan I think althought the site has spanish translation.

https://www.sangakoo.com/en 

Here is the website, it just contains a libary of mathematical theory which I have found personally useful and I hope people here do too
No.3509 • 
anon@277 
More
Options
Copy link
Report
No sounds japanese though
No.3508 • 
anon@277 
More
Options
Copy link
Report
Sangaku Maths

Anyone heard of it?
No.2516 • 
anon@277 
More
Options
Copy link
Report
A cool little video about imaginary numbers, see 5:12 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8CXG7dS-D0